Find savings before
the structure is fixed.
For developers, owners, and their structural engineers:
Send the current ETABS or FEM model and receive a decision-ready PDF plus an updated model in about 1–2 days. See concrete and cost options without taking design authority away from the project engineer.
Where is the material working-and where is it not?
Put stiffness where the tower needs it.
Examine cast-in-place reinforced-concrete shear-wall systems under wind and seismic demands. Structure Pal studies practical distributions of stiffness, wall thickness, concrete grades, and selected layout alternatives against project criteria for drift and acceleration.
The target is a buildable set of changes: lower concrete volume and cost without adding construction complexity. The project structural engineer reviews every recommendation against the full design basis.
Wall thickness and concrete grade by level
Stiffness distribution through the building
Drift and acceleration context
Practical wall-layout alternatives where useful
Concrete-volume and cost comparisons
Four steps. Leaner project.
01
Frame the decision
We align on the project stage, structural question, applicable criteria, and the decisions still open to the team.
02
Share the working model
Your team provides the current ETABS or FEM model with the agreed project inputs and assumptions. We confirm the scope before the study begins.
03
Run the study together
Structure Pal works in collaboration with the project structural engineer, raising questions as they appear and keeping proposed changes tied to buildability.
04
Review the options
In about 1–2 days, receive the PDF and updated model. The project structural engineer checks the inputs and recommendations, selects what is appropriate, and completes the project design.
Material your team can review.
Decision-ready PDF
An organized record of the study, including plans, assumptions, proposed changes, and quantified material, cost, savings, and ROI context where applicable.
Level-by-level views
Clear plan markups showing where elements may thicken, remain, or reduce, with the engineering context needed for review.
Updated structural model
An ETABS or FEM model containing the proposed changes, ready for the project structural engineer to inspect and independently check.
Collaborative review
A focused discussion with the developer and project structural engineer so commercial impact and structural responsibility remain connected.
Pricing
SINGLE PROJECT
$2 USD
per m² GFA
A first engagement or a defined mid- or high-rise project.
-
One agreed operator-run optimization study
-
Lateral Optimization, Layout Insights, or a project-specific combination
-
Collaboration with the project structural engineer
-
Decision-ready PDF and updated ETABS or FEM model
-
Typical delivery in about 1–2 days after inputs are confirmed
-
Minimum 3:1 ROI guarantee, subject to agreed terms
Average observed ROI:
8.5:1 high-rise · 6:1 mid-rise
ANNUAL RETAINER
Contact Us
Developers and engineering teams with several structures to review each year.
-
Up to 7 projects during the annual term
-
Operator-run studies scoped to each project
-
Collaboration with each project’s structural engineer
-
PDF and updated model for each completed study
-
A repeatable review process across the pipeline
Average observed ROI:
13.5:1 high-rise · 7.5:1 mid-rise